1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Upholds Commissioner's Decision on Service Tax Interest Demand</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the Commissioner's decision to drop review proceedings on interest demand for delay in Service Tax ... Revenue filed appeal against the revised order of the Commissioner in which he dropped the review proceedings β revenueβs submission is that there is a delay in payment of tax and, therefore, penalty is imposable - since demand of interest was paid by the respondent before issue of the SCN and both the authorities below have given detailed finding for non-imposition of penalty, there is no any reason to interfere the order of the Commissioner. The appeal filed by the revenue is rejected. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi upheld the decision of the Commissioner to drop review proceedings regarding the demand of interest for delay in Service Tax payment. The Tribunal rejected the revenue's appeal for penalty imposition due to the interest being paid before the show-cause notice was issued.