Manufacture at job worker's premises and credit without receipt of inputs: dies relieved, scrap shortage demand upheld.

Mere supply of hollow pipes and end plates did not make the dies manufactured at the assessee's premises, because manufacture was completed at the job worker's premises and the removable end plates were only fitted later; the duty demand and penalty on the dies were therefore set aside. On the scrap shortage, the assessee had not raised the mixed-input plea before the original authority, and the shortage showed credit had been taken without receipt of inputs; the duty demand and penalty were therefore upheld. The appeal succeeded only on the dies and failed on the scrap shortage, giving partial relief to the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the demand of duty and penalty on the dies was sustainable when the assessee contended that the dies came into existence at the job worker's premises; (ii) Whether the duty demand and penalty on shortage of scrap were sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether the demand of duty and penalty on the dies was sustainable when the assessee contended that the dies came into existence at the job worker's premises.

Analysis: The dies were found to have been manufactured at the job worker's premises, and the mere supply of hollow pipes and end plates did not mean that manufacture occurred at the assessee's factory when the end plates were later fitted. The fitting of removable end plates, required to be taken off for each operation, did not amount to manufacture at the assessee's premises.

Conclusion: The duty demand and penalty relating to the dies were not sustainable and were set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the duty demand and penalty on shortage of scrap were sustainable.

Analysis: The assessee had not raised the factual plea regarding the mixed nature of inputs before the original authority, and the plea required verification. The shortage related to bales found short vis-a -vis the receipt account, showing that credit had been taken without receipt of inputs. On these facts, the shortage could not be treated as a mere theoretical discrepancy.

Conclusion: The duty demand and penalty relating to the scrap shortage were upheld in favour of the Revenue.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in respect of the dies and failed in respect of the scrap shortage, resulting in partial relief to the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Mere fitting of removable components at the buyer's premises, where manufacture is completed at the job worker's premises, does not constitute manufacture at the buyer's premises; conversely, credit taken without receipt of inputs justifies confirmation of duty and penalty.

---