TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Authorities cannot lower penalties below prescribed minimum, High Court Rajasthan rules, remands case for penalty determination.</h1> <h3>UNION OF INDIA Versus SHIV RATAN ADVERTISERS</h3> The High Court Rajasthan held that authorities cannot lower penalties below the prescribed minimum, based on precedent. The case is remanded to the ... In view of judgment of this Court dated. 23.4.2008 passed in Union of India Vs. Aakar Advertising it is held that the authority including the Tribunal have no jurisdiction to reduce the penalty below the minimum prescribed - Matter is remanded back to the learned Commissioner to be decided afresh the amount of penalty to be imposed under Section 76 between the minimum and maximum permissible limits. The High Court Rajasthan ruled that authorities cannot reduce penalties below the minimum prescribed, citing a previous judgment. The case is remanded back to the Commissioner to decide the penalty amount between the minimum and maximum limits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
