1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Chennai: Appellants win waiver of pre-deposit for service tax, interest & penalties. Documentation charges dispute settled.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving pre-deposit and stay of recovery of service tax, interest, and penalties ... Service tax liability under the category of BAS under Section 65(19)(a) in respect of documentation charges/fees collected from importers and exporters of cargo - appellants has claimed that, in respect of identical activity performed by the company at Mumbai, a similar dispute has been settled in their favour - hence Revenue cannot claim prima facie case for enforcing the impugned demand of tax against the assessee at Chennai β stay granted The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants, waiving pre-deposit and stay of recovery of service tax, interest, and penalties totaling over Rs. 27 lakhs. The demand was for 'Business Auxiliary Services' related to documentation charges collected from importers and exporters of cargo. The Tribunal noted a similar dispute settled in favor of the company at Mumbai, where the Department dropped the proposal to levy service tax. Therefore, the demand of tax against the appellants in Chennai was not upheld.