1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Chennai: Packed Tea Not Separate Excisable Commodity</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai dismissed the appeal regarding whether activities on tea in Sholayar factory amounted to manufacture for excise ... Unpacked tea brought from sister units u/r 173H for packing, on payment of duty - whether the impugned activities amount to manufacture - It is not the case of the appellant that packaged tea was a different excisable commodity after 1-3-1999 - It is a clear finding in the order of the appellate Commissioner that, from 1-3-1999, packaged tea was not a separate excisable commodity - This finding has not been challenged in the present appeal – hence revenue appeal is liable to be dismissed The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai considered whether activities on tea in Sholayar factory amounted to manufacture for excise duty. Packed tea was not a separate excisable commodity after 1-3-1999. The appeal was dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
