Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods cleared in 50 ml bottles for free distribution, without an element of retail sale, were assessable under section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 or under section 4 of that Act.
Analysis: The goods had been cleared on contract price for supply with seeds and were not meant for sale in the market. The Tribunal relied on its earlier decision in the assessee's own case and on the Supreme Court's ruling in Jayanti Food Processing and Nestle India. The governing principle applied was that section 4A is attracted only where the package is required to bear retail sale price and there is an element of sale as contemplated by the Standards of Weights and Measures law. If the package is meant for free supply and no retail sale price is required or relevant, the package falls outside section 4A and is valued under section 4.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to assessment under section 4A and were assessable under section 4. The Revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: The demand based on section 4A valuation was not sustainable on the facts found, and the assessee's assessment basis was upheld.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 4A applies only when the package is one for which retail sale price is required and there is an element of sale; goods intended for free supply without such sale are to be valued under section 4.