TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Importer not liable for Section 114AA penalty for misclassifying tape ribbons as cotton instead of polyester due to supplier's admitted error</h1> <h3>M/s. J.G. Impex Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva-III</h3> M/s. J.G. Impex Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Customs, Nhava Sheva-III - TMI Issues Involved:The issues involved in this case include misclassification of goods, duty assessment based on revised invoice, confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalties under various sections of the Customs Act, 1962.Misclassification of Goods:The appellant filed a Bill of Entry for goods declared as 'Tape Ribbons Strips for labels (for industrial use)' composed of cotton, but on examination, they were found to be of polyester. The goods were reclassified under Tariff Item 58063200 instead of the declared Tariff Item 58063190. The appellant accepted the error, and the supplier revised the invoice value accordingly.Duty Assessment Based on Revised Invoice:The Additional Commissioner re-assessed the duty at a higher rate based on the reclassified goods, leading to a lower duty payable by the appellant. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the re-assessment as per the revised invoice but reduced the redemption fine and penalties.Confiscation of Goods and Imposition of Redemption Fine:The Additional Commissioner ordered the confiscation of the goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962, due to misdeclaration. The appellant was given the option to release the goods on payment of a redemption fine, which was later reduced by the Commissioner (Appeals) from Rs. 3,00,000 to Rs. 1,50,000.Penalties Imposed:Penalties were imposed on the importer under Section 112(a) and Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962, for misdeclaration and false documentation. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the penalties, but the final judgment partly allowed the appeal by setting aside the penalty under Section 114AA and reducing the redemption fine and penalty under Section 112(a).Conclusion:The judgment addressed the misclassification of goods, duty assessment based on the revised invoice, confiscation of goods, imposition of redemption fine, and penalties under the Customs Act, 1962. The final decision partly allowed the appeal by modifying the penalties imposed and reducing the redemption fine, considering the circumstances of the case.
TaxTMI 