1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court of India dismisses appeal, decides no interference needed with the order, and settles all pending applications.</h1> The SC of India condoned the delay and determined that the impugned order required no interference, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. Furthermore, ... Classification of services - production, supply and installation of structural glazing, sliding doors and window to residential buildings - it was held by CESTAT that 'the activity involved, apart from service, supply of goods and it was a composite activity.' HELD THAT:- This Court is of the opinion that the impugned order does not call for interference - Appeal dismissed. Issues involved: Delay condonation, dismissal of appeal, disposal of pending applications.In the judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India, the Court, after condoning the delay, held that the impugned order did not warrant any interference. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed. Additionally, all pending applications were disposed of by the Court.