TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the link road and parking area at the aerodrome were "public places" within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, so as to require a permit for operating stage carriages there. (ii) Whether the respondent corporation could lawfully ply the buses through the link road and parking area without a permit under Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
Issue (i): Whether the link road and parking area at the aerodrome were "public places" within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, so as to require a permit for operating stage carriages there.
Analysis: The definition of "public place" in Section 2(24) turns primarily on a right of access in favour of the public. The link road and parking area formed part of defence-controlled premises and public access was only permissive, not as of right. The inclusive limb of the definition, covering places where passengers are picked up or set down, was treated as ancillary to the main definition and was not read as extending the provision to places where the public had no right of access. On that basis, the link road and parking area could not be treated as public places for the purpose of the Act.
Conclusion: The link road and parking area were not public places under the Act.
Issue (ii): Whether the respondent corporation could lawfully ply the buses through the link road and parking area without a permit under Chapter IV-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939.
Analysis: Section 42(1) applies only to use of a transport vehicle in a public place. Chapter IV-A and the concept of a notified route proceed on the basis of a highway, and the link road and parking area were not a highway or part of a notified route. Since the places in question were outside the statutory concept of a public place and were not part of a notified route, no motor vehicle permit was required for that limited use. The permission granted by the Civil Aviation Department was sufficient for access to the premises.
Conclusion: No permit under Section 42(1) or Chapter IV-A was required for the respondent to operate the buses through the link road and parking area.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the introduction of the two bus services failed, and the original petition was dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: For the Motor Vehicles Act, a place falls within "public place" only when the public has a right of access, and the inclusive reference to places where passengers are picked up or set down does not extend the definition to merely permissive, privately controlled premises.
TaxTMI 
