Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the scheme of arrangement and compromise between the company and its shareholders deserved sanction under the Companies Act, 1956.
Analysis: The required procedural steps were shown to have been complied with, including shareholder consent, no objection from secured creditors, and the report of the Regional Director indicating no objection. The scheme was found not to prejudice any stakeholder, not to violate statutory provisions, and to be fair, just, sound, and not contrary to public policy or public interest. No proceeding under Sections 231 to 237 of the Companies Act, 1956 was shown to be pending.
Conclusion: The scheme of arrangement and compromise was sanctioned.