2007 (12) TMI 197 - AT - Service Tax

Tribunal upholds penalties for tax non-compliance, sets aside penalty for timely deposit.

GANESH AUTOMOBILES Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., JAIPUR-II

GANESH AUTOMOBILES Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., JAIPUR-II - 2008 (12) S.T.R. 307 (Tri. - Del.) Issues:Imposition of penalty under Sections 76, 78, and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-filing of ST-3 return, suppression of facts with intent to evade service tax, and failure to deposit tax on time.Analysis:The case involved the appellant appealing against the imposition of penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant, engaged in providing services as an 'Authorised Service Station,' was issued show cause notices for non-filing of ST-3 returns for specific quarters. The appellant had registered in 2001 and had deposited the tax and filed the returns after the issuance of the show cause notices. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of tax, appropriated the deposited amount, and imposed penalties under Sections 76, 78, and 77 of the Act. The appellant argued that they had deposited the tax before the notices were issued and that the penalties were unwarranted due to fund constraints causing a delay in tax payment.The appellant's counsel contended that the allegation of suppression of facts to evade service tax was baseless as the tax was paid before the notices were served. On the other hand, the Revenue representative argued that there was suppression of facts leading to tax evasion. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted the appellant's actions post the show cause notices and observed a delay in filing returns and tax payment. The Commissioner found that the delay did not amount to suppression of facts to evade tax, setting aside the penalty under Section 78. However, penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were upheld due to the appellant's failure to file returns and pay tax within the stipulated period despite depositing the tax before the notices were issued.Upon review, the Tribunal concurred with the Commissioner's findings. The Tribunal acknowledged the appellant's deposit of tax before the notices but upheld penalties under Sections 76 and 77 due to the failure to file returns and pay tax within the required timeframe. The imposition of penalty under Section 78 was set aside as the delay in filing returns and tax payment was not considered as suppression of facts to evade tax. The Tribunal modified the impugned order accordingly, affirming penalties under Sections 76 and 77 but setting aside the penalty under Section 78.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld penalties under Sections 76 and 77 of the Finance Act, 1994, while setting aside the penalty under Section 78, based on the appellant's actions regarding tax payment and return filing in response to the show cause notices.