1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Protective additions deleted when substantive assessments against primary entity already removed by tribunal</h1> The ITAT Ahmedabad allowed the assessee's appeal regarding protective additions made for cash received against booking of shops in Kunj Mall. Since the ... Addition on a protective basis - addition being protective addition on account of cash received against booking of shops in Kunj Mall - “substantive assessments” in the hands of M/s Kunj Infrastructure Private Limited have itself been deleted by the ITAT [2019 (10) TMI 1588 - ITAT AHMEDABAD] - HELD THAT:- Since the “substantive addition” have been deleted by the ITAT, Ahmedabad in the hands of M/s Kunj Infrastructure Private Limited, respectfully following view taken by various Courts in various decisions on this issue referred to above, we are of the considered view that the additions made in the hands of the assessee on “protective basis” cannot sustain once the additions made on “substantive basis” have been deleted. Appeal of the assessee is allowed. Issues Involved:1. Reopening of the case u/s 147.2. Addition of Rs. 2,72,00,000/- on a protective basis.Summary:Issue 1: Reopening of the case u/s 147The assessee contended that the Ld. CIT (A) erred in law and on the facts of the case in confirming the action of the AO in reopening the case u/s 147 of the Act. The Tribunal noted that the substantive additions in the hands of M/s Kunj Infrastructure Private Limited were deleted by ITAT Ahmedabad, thus invalidating the protective assessment in the hands of the assessee.Issue 2: Addition of Rs. 2,72,00,000/- on a protective basisThe assessee argued that the protective addition of Rs. 2,72,00,000/- made by the AO was not sustainable since the substantive additions in the hands of M/s Kunj Infrastructure Private Limited were deleted by ITAT Ahmedabad. The Tribunal observed that protective assessments cannot stand independently without substantive assessments. Citing various precedents, the Tribunal concluded that since the substantive additions were deleted, the protective additions in the hands of the assessee could not be sustained.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, holding that the protective additions made in the hands of the assessee could not be sustained once the substantive additions were deleted. The appeal was thus allowed, and the order pronounced in the open court on 17-04-2023.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
