Tribunal Grants Tax Exemption to Educational Institution, Overturns Prior Decision on AY 2014-15 and 2017-18 Appeals.

The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee for AY 2014-15 and 2017-18, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision. It concluded that the appellant's activities, focused on enhancing technical competencies and providing consultancy services, were aligned with educational objectives and not purely commercial. Consequently, the Tribunal granted the benefit of Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, recognizing the appellant's entitlement to tax exemption as an educational institution.

---

---

Issues involved: Appeal against orders of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 concerning AY 2014-15 & 2017-18.

Issue 1: Assessment Order Challenge (AY 2014-15)
The appellant challenged the assessment order as bad-in-law, void ab initio, and contrary to facts. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance u/s. 11 and taxed the entire income as business income, disregarding provisions of section 11. The appellant contended that its objects and activities should be considered as those of an educational institution. The appellant, registered under S.12AA, claimed exemption under S.11 for developing skilled manpower and running technical courses. The major receipts were from consultancy services to government, semi-government, and private organizations, indicating commercial activities. The AO held the activities were commercial and not charitable, leading to an addition of Rs. 1,50,21,153.

Issue 2: Appeal and Arguments (AY 2014-15)
The appellant argued that its activities were non-commercial and should benefit from Section 11, citing relevant case laws. Lower authorities deemed the activities commercial, but the appellant contended that nominal fees charged for activities essential for smoother operations did not constitute commercial activities. As the appellant was imparting education and training without doubt, the benefit of Section 11 should not be denied.

Issue 3: Decision and Conclusion
After reviewing the records and arguments, the Tribunal allowed both appeals filed by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the appellant's activities, aimed at enhancing technical competencies and providing consultancy services, were not purely commercial but aligned with educational objectives. Therefore, the benefit of Section 11 of the Act was granted to the appellant, overturning the CIT(A)'s decision.

---