Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was invalid for want of approval under Section 151, and whether the order under Section 148A(d) called for interference in writ jurisdiction.
Analysis: Approval of the specified authority is required for passing an order under Section 148A(d), but a notice under Section 148A(b) is not itself an order and does not require such prior approval. The impugned order did not result in a final assessment or demand, and the petitioner retained the opportunity to raise all merits in the subsequent reassessment proceedings.
Conclusion: The challenge to the notice and the order failed. The Court declined to interfere with the impugned order and left the petitioner to urge all available grounds before the assessing officer in the reassessment proceeding.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained on merits beyond the limited legal objection, and the reassessment process was allowed to proceed.
Ratio Decidendi: A notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is not an order and does not require prior approval under Section 151, while interference with an order under Section 148A(d) is unwarranted where the assessee can contest the reassessment on merits in the statutory proceedings.