Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the section 7 application was barred by limitation in view of the alleged date of default.
Analysis: The record showed payments made by the corporate debtor well beyond 2015, including a last payment on 23.02.2017, and a later proposal for one-time settlement. These acts constituted acknowledgment of the debt and supported the continuing subsistence of the liability for limitation purposes. The application filed on 31.01.2020 was therefore within the period prescribed under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
Conclusion: The limitation objection failed and the challenge to admission of the section 7 application was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was dismissed as the application under section 7 was held to be within limitation on account of acknowledgment of debt and subsequent payments.
Ratio Decidendi: Subsequent payments and other clear acknowledgments of a debt extend limitation for a section 7 insolvency application, keeping the claim within time under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963.