Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in a pending probate appeal, the Court could restrain the appellant from alienating or otherwise dealing with the property forming the subject matter of the testamentary proceeding.
Analysis: The appellant had already transferred part of the property and intended further alienation during pendency of the appeal. The Court distinguished authorities relied upon by the appellant and applied the principle that, even where the dispute is as to the validity of a will or grant of letters of administration, the Court may use its inherent power to preserve the subject matter of the litigation. Relying on the settled principle that interim protection may be granted to prevent the decree from becoming ineffective, the Court held that Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure could be invoked to protect the property during the pendency of the appeal.
Conclusion: The Court held that an injunction could be granted and restrained the appellant from alienating, transferring, encumbering, or damaging the suit property until disposal of the appeal.