Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 can be re-determined on the basis of an award passed by a Lok Adalat.
Analysis: Section 28A confers a right to seek re-determination where the Court awards compensation in excess of the Collector's award. A Lok Adalat award, under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, is deemed to be a decree of a civil court and is final and binding. Section 22 further equips the Lok Adalat with civil court powers. An award passed by the Lok Adalat in a reference case therefore stands on the same footing as a court decree, and the statutory fiction extends to such award for the purpose of Section 28A. The applications were also made within the prescribed period.
Conclusion: The claim for re-determination under Section 28A on the basis of the Lok Adalat award is maintainable and the rejection orders are unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A Lok Adalat award, being a deemed decree of a civil court under Section 21 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, can constitute the basis for re-determination of compensation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.