Bail in money-laundering cases may be refused where the alleged economic offence is grave and affects public interest.

The application concerned bail in a money-laundering case arising from allegations of large-scale embezzlement and diversion of public funds. The Court treated the gravity of the alleged economic offence as the central consideration and noted that such offences can have a wider adverse impact on public and national interests. On that assessment of the surrounding circumstances and seriousness of the accusation, the Court found release on bail was not justified and rejected the bail request.

---

---

Issues: Whether the applicant was entitled to bail in a money-laundering case having regard to the gravity of the alleged economic offence and the surrounding circumstances.

Analysis: The application arose from allegations of large-scale embezzlement and money laundering. The material before the Court indicated the seriousness of the accusation, the alleged diversion of public money, and the economic impact of the offence. In deciding the bail request, the Court placed emphasis on the gravity of the offence and the settled consideration that economic offences may have a wider adverse effect on public and national interests. On that assessment, the circumstances did not justify release on bail.

Conclusion: Bail was rejected.

---