TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Confirms Limits on Section 14A Disallowance & Validity of Tribunal's Decision on Fictitious Losses.</h1> <h3>THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD Versus M/s. AFFLUENCE COMMODITIES PVT. LTD.</h3> THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), AHMEDABAD Versus M/s. AFFLUENCE COMMODITIES PVT. LTD. - TMI Issues Involved:1. Interpretation of provisions under Section 153A regarding additions made on fictitious losses and disallowance under Section 14A.2. Limitation on disallowance under Section 14A in relation to exempt income earned by the assesses.3. Exclusion of disallowance under Section 14A while computing Book Profit under Section 115JB.4. Deletion of additions in respect of allowance of losses from a specific entity and determination of whether it was an accommodation entry.Issue 1 - Interpretation of Section 153A provisions:The High Court deliberated on whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting additions related to fictitious losses and disallowance under Section 14A during an assessment under Section 153A. The court analyzed the scope of Section 153A, emphasizing the requirement for incriminating material found during a search under Section 132(1) of the Act. The judgment scrutinized the absence of a stipulation in Section 153A regarding the scope of additions, especially in the context of no assessment under Section 143(3) despite processing the return under Section 143(1) without scrutiny proceedings.Issue 2 - Limitation on disallowance under Section 14A:The Court examined whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in determining that disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income earned by the assesses. This analysis involved a detailed review of the legal provisions and the factual circumstances of the case to ascertain the correct interpretation and application of Section 14A.Issue 3 - Exclusion of disallowance under Section 14A for Book Profit computation:In this issue, the Court assessed whether the Appellate Tribunal was justified in excluding the disallowance under Section 14A while computing Book Profit under Section 115JB. The judgment focused on the interpretation of Explanation 1 to Section 115JB(2), particularly clause (f), to determine the correctness of the Tribunal's decision in this regard.Issue 4 - Deletion of additions related to specific entity's losses:The High Court analyzed whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in deleting additions concerning losses from a specific entity, M/s. Mari Gold Vanijya Private Limited, Kolkata. The judgment scrutinized the nature of the transaction, considering whether it constituted an accommodation entry. The Court evaluated the factual matrix and determined whether the Tribunal's decision to delete the additions was based on a correct assessment of the facts or if it was deemed perverse.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal issues addressed by the High Court in this case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
