Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the levy of IGST on ocean freight for services supplied by a person located in a non-taxable territory for transportation of goods by vessel from a place outside India up to the customs station of clearance in India was sustainable, and whether Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and entry 10 of Notification No. 10/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The issue was treated as settled by the Supreme Court decision in Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd., which held that the recipient was not liable to pay IGST on ocean freight in the stated situation. In light of that binding position, the challenged levy and the corresponding notification entries could not survive scrutiny and were beyond the powers conferred by law.
Conclusion: The petitioner was held not liable to pay IGST on ocean freight, and the impugned notification and entry were quashed as ultra vires.