Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an agreement granting exclusive right to collect toll tax under an auction-cum-lease arrangement is a "lease" within Section 2(16)(c) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 and chargeable to stamp duty under Article 35(b) of Schedule I-B, or whether it is merely a security bond chargeable under Article 57 of Schedule I-B.
Analysis: The instrument and the auction notice showed that the successful bidder was granted exclusive right to collect toll for a fixed period against consideration of a fixed annual amount payable in instalments. Section 2(16) of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 gives an inclusive definition of lease and specifically covers any instrument by which tolls of any description are let. On a proper construction of the agreement, the monthly amount was lease money for the toll rights and not a security for due performance of the contract. Article 35(b) of Schedule I-B applies to such a lease, whereas Article 57 applies only to security bonds or similar instruments executed for due performance of an obligation. The judgments relied upon by the High Court dealt with a different situation involving security for contract performance and were not applicable.
Conclusion: The agreement was a lease for collection of toll and was chargeable to stamp duty under Article 35(b) of Schedule I-B of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, not under Article 57.