Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit in relation to Modvat credit on evaporation boats, and whether the item was to be examined as inputs under Rule 57A or as capital goods under Rule 57Q.
Analysis: The item was claimed as eligible for Modvat credit, while the department treated it as capital goods and denied benefit under Rule 57A. The order records that the precise classification under the Modvat scheme was a matter for the concerned authority, and that the immediate question for consideration was whether the appellant had shown sufficient grounds for waiver of pre-deposit. On the facts placed before it, the case for prima facie consideration was found to be strong.
Outcome: The prayer for waiver of pre-deposit was allowed.