Insolvency moratorium bars continuation of pending tax appeals against a corporate debtor during CIRP.

Admission of CIRP triggered the moratorium under section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which barred continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor before courts, tribunals and authorities. On that basis, the pending income-tax appeals could not be effectively proceeded with during the resolution period and were treated as infructuous for the time being. The appeals were dismissed without adjudication on the merits, with liberty to seek re-institution after completion of the insolvency resolution process.

---

---

Issues: Whether the pendency of corporate insolvency resolution proceedings and the moratorium under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 barred continuation of the income-tax appeals; and whether the connected appeals could be treated as infructuous.

Analysis: The corporate debtor was subject to a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 pursuant to admission of the insolvency application under Section 7 of that Code. The moratorium prohibited continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor before any court, tribunal or authority. In view of the admitted CIRP and the statutory bar, the appeals could not be effectively proceeded with during the resolution period.

Conclusion: The appeals were held to be not maintainable for the time being and were dismissed as infructuous, with liberty to seek re-institution after completion of the resolution process.

Final Conclusion: The decision terminated the pending tax appeals without adjudication on the merits because the insolvency moratorium operated against continuation of the proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi: Once a moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 comes into force on admission of CIRP, proceedings against the corporate debtor before judicial or quasi-judicial fora cannot continue and pending appeals become infructuous during the moratorium period.

---