Company gets section 80G approval after tribunal overturns rejection based on valid 12AA registration

ITAT Raipur allowed the appeal and directed CIT(E) to grant section 80G approval to the assessee company. The tribunal held that rejection was erroneous since the company already held valid 12AA registration, indicating charitable status. Commercial activities like selling books and collecting fees were deemed incidental to main charitable objects for survival and fulfillment of primary purposes. The tribunal relied on Green Education Trust precedent and concluded CIT(E) wrongly rejected the application, setting aside the order with direction to grant 80G approval.

---

---

Issues:

1. Rejection of application for approval u/s.80G by CIT(E)
2. Charitable activities vs. commercial nature of the company
3. Consideration of generating surplus for denial of approval u/s.80G

Issue 1: Rejection of application for approval u/s.80G by CIT(E):

The appeal was filed against the CIT(E)'s order rejecting the application for approval u/s.80G. The CIT(E) observed that the company's activities were commercial and lacked justification for 80G approval. The appellant argued that it was involved in charitable activities and had not used income for non-charitable purposes. The appellant also highlighted the registration u/s 12AA and cited judicial precedents supporting eligibility for 80G approval. The Tribunal found the rejection unjustified, considering the company's charitable nature and activities.

Issue 2: Charitable activities vs. commercial nature of the company:

The CIT(E) based the rejection on the perceived commercial nature of the company's activities, including selling items and generating income from fees. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that such activities were incidental to the main charitable objectives. Citing a Mumbai ITAT case, it emphasized that educational activities, even if fees are charged, are considered charitable. The Tribunal also referred to a Supreme Court ruling that earning a surplus does not disqualify an educational institution from charitable status.

Issue 3: Consideration of generating surplus for denial of approval u/s.80G:

The CIT(E) denied approval based on the company's surplus generation and lack of demonstrated need for donations. However, the Tribunal referenced an Amritsar ITAT case, emphasizing that registration under 12AA and subsequent genuine activities should qualify for 80G approval. It highlighted the need for a positive satisfaction of stipulated conditions for approval. The Tribunal found the CIT(E)'s concerns regarding donations and potential misuse insufficient to deny 80G approval, directing the grant of approval to the appellant.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the CIT(E)'s order and directing the grant of approval u/s.80G to the appellant. The decision was based on the company's charitable nature, incidental commercial activities, and compliance with registration requirements under 12AA. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of genuine activities and positive satisfaction of conditions for 80G approval, rejecting concerns over surplus generation and donation needs as grounds for denial.

---