1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Ahmedabad Overturns Appeal Dismissal, Remands for Decision on Merit</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s dismissal of the appeal due to non-compliance with stay order directions. ... Commissioner (Appeals) has dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the directions contained in his stay order, - pre-deposit of tax amount which is almost 90%, along with 100% interest amount, should have been considered sufficient by Commissioner (Appeals) for the purposes of Section 35F and should have disposed off the appeal on merit instead of dismissing appeal for non-compliance - impugned order is set aside and matter is remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merit The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad found that the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal due to non-compliance with the directions in the stay order. The appellants had already deposited most of the required amount. The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the matter for decision on merit without requiring further pre-deposit.