1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Income Tax Officer's order nullified for lack of reasoning; CCIT to reassess with due process within six weeks.</h1> The HC allowed the writ petition, nullifying the Income Tax Officer's order due to lack of reasons, which was deemed arbitrary and contrary to due process ... - Issues involved: Show cause notice for exemption under Section 10 (23c) (VI) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for assessment year 2005-06.Summary:Issue 1: Show cause notice and rejection of applicationA show cause notice was issued to the petitioner regarding the rejection of their application for exemption under Section 10 (23c) (VI) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2005-06. The Income Tax Officer pointed out deficiencies in the survey and records, to which the petitioner responded on 24.12.2007. However, the application was rejected without considering the reply provided by the petitioner.Issue 2: Lack of reasons in the orderThe High Court noted that the Income Tax Officer did not provide any reasons in the order for deeming the petitioner's reply unsatisfactory. Emphasizing the importance of giving reasons, the Court highlighted that it is essential for fairness in decision-making, accountability, and transparency. The absence of reasons in the order was considered arbitrary and not in line with the principles of due process.Decision and OrderThe High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the order passed by the Income Tax Officer. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax was directed to reconsider the petitioner's reply, providing sufficient reasons and showing application of mind. The Chief Commissioner was instructed to do so expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from the production of a certified copy of the High Court's order.