Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pasting slips bearing the principal manufacturer's brand name on old and used cartons containing textured yarn amounted to use of another person's brand name so as to deny the benefit of small scale exemption under Notification No. 1/93.
Analysis: The appellants manufactured textured yarn on job work basis and the record showed no finding that they had any plant or machinery for dyeing yarn. The recovered slips were found to be used for identifying the yarn and preventing mixing with other consignments, and the cartons were old and used. The goods were not being marketed by the appellants as branded goods; they were being cleared to the brand owner for further dyeing and packing. On these facts, the use of slips on cartons for identification could not be treated as use of the brand name of another person on the goods. The reasoning was consistent with the principle that use of a mark on the cover or carton, without use on the goods themselves, does not amount to disqualifying use of another's brand name.
Conclusion: The appellants were not disentitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/93, and the allegation of use of another person's brand name failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Pasting an identifying slip or brand reference on an old carton used for transport or segregation, where the goods are not marketed under that mark and the mark is not used on the goods themselves, does not amount to use of another person's brand name for denying small scale exemption.