Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from centralized services provided to Indian hotels constituted fees for technical services or fees for included services, or were taxable as business income in the absence of a permanent establishment in India.
Analysis: The centralized services were found to be predominantly advertising, marketing, reservation and promotion services rendered under a distinct agreement. The earlier decisions in the assessee's own case and in the group concern had already held that such receipts did not fall within the scope of fees for technical services under section 9(1)(vii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 or fees for included services under Article 12 of the India-USA tax treaty. The services were not ancillary and subsidiary to the enjoyment of any royalty-bearing right, nor was the make available condition satisfied under the relevant treaty provision. The treaty analysis also showed that the arrangement was an integrated business arrangement for promotion of hotel business, and the receipts could not be artificially split to bring any part within royalty or technical service character.
Conclusion: The receipts from centralized services were not taxable as fees for technical services or fees for included services and were only business income. In the absence of a permanent establishment in India, they were not taxable in India.