Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts invested under the share subscription and shareholders arrangements, supplemented by the binding term sheet and crystallised through the consent terms and consent award, constituted financial debt in default so as to sustain an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Analysis: The investment was not treated as a mere share purchase. The agreements showed that the funds were raised for the corporate debtor's real estate project, that the supplementary arrangement was for further funding, and that the investors were promised an exit with internal rate of return. The consent terms and award did not create a new independent claim divorced from the underlying transaction; they crystallised liabilities arising from the same commercial arrangement. The inclusive scope of Section 5(8) was applied, particularly the limb covering transactions having the commercial effect of a borrowing. The Court held that the presence of an arbitral consent award did not by itself exclude the claim from the definition of financial debt where the underlying transaction satisfied the statutory ingredients.
Conclusion: The claim was held to be a financial debt and the default under the consent award was sufficient to maintain the Section 7 application.
Ratio Decidendi: A liability arising from funds raised under a commercial investment arrangement, where the transaction has the commercial effect of borrowing and provides for return with time value of money, falls within financial debt even if later crystallised in a consent award.