Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether employees of the statutory autonomous body were to be treated as having switched over to the pension scheme by operation of the government memorandum and service regulations, and whether a later purported option to remain under the contributory provident fund scheme could defeat that deeming effect.
Analysis: The government memorandum created a legal fiction that all CPF beneficiaries in service on the relevant date would be deemed to have come over to the pension scheme unless they expressly opted to continue under CPF within the stipulated time. The employees did not exercise such option within time. Once the deeming provision operated, they became members of the pension scheme, and Regulation 16 of the service regulations applied to them automatically. A later purported CPF option could not undo the statutory fiction. The objection that the pension scheme was a new scheme was rejected as proceeding on a wrong premise, because the memorandum and the accepted pay commission recommendations had already brought the employees within the pension regime.
Conclusion: The employees were held to be governed by the pension scheme, and the order of the Division Bench modifying the writ court's relief was set aside. The appeal failed.