Land acquisition compensation after Section 25 amendment is not capped by the claimant's demand; market value controls.

After the 1984 amendment to Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, compensation is not confined to the amount claimed by the landowner; the earlier ceiling was removed and only the minimum safeguard against falling below the Collector's award remains. Applying that principle, the SC assessed the acquired land on its own facts and rejected parity with higher-valued highway-side comparables because the property was away from the national highway and had limited access. The Court nonetheless found the State's valuation too low and fixed the market value at Rs. 200 per square yard, with statutory benefits.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether, after the amendment to Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the Court is restricted to awarding compensation only up to the amount claimed by the landowner; (ii) what would be the just and fair market value of the acquired land in the facts of the case.

Issue (i): Whether, after the amendment to Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the Court is restricted to awarding compensation only up to the amount claimed by the landowner.

Analysis: The pre-amended provision imposed a ceiling on the maximum amount that could be awarded with reference to the claimant's demand. The amendment, however, removed that ceiling and substituted only a minimum safeguard, namely that compensation should not be lower than the amount awarded by the Collector. The legal position was reinforced by earlier decisions recognising that, in the absence of a statutory bar, compensation can be awarded on the basis of the true market value even if it exceeds the amount pleaded.

Conclusion: The Court held that compensation under the amended provision is not confined to the amount claimed by the landowner.

Issue (ii): What would be the just and fair market value of the acquired land in the facts of the case.

Analysis: The land was acquired for residential and commercial development, but the acquired property did not have the same highway advantage as the comparable lands relied upon by the appellants. It was situated away from the national highway and had only limited connecting access. On that factual basis, the Court found that the parity claimed with lands fetching Rs. 250 per square yard was not justified, but the land still warranted a higher value than the figure accepted by the State.

Conclusion: The Court fixed the land value at Rs. 200 per square yard and directed payment of statutory benefits accordingly.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded to the extent of enhancement of compensation, and the acquired land was valued at Rs. 200 per square yard with statutory benefits.

Ratio Decidendi: After the 1984 amendment to Section 25 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, compensation is determined by the court's assessment of just and fair market value and is not limited by the amount claimed, though the award must not fall below the Collector's figure.

---