Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of statutory bail under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the date on which the accused is produced before the Court and remanded to custody is to be included in computing the period of 60 days or 90 days.
Analysis: The Court noted that the later Supreme Court decision had considered the earlier view and had held that, while computing the period for filing the charge-sheet, the date on which the accused is remanded to judicial custody is to be excluded. On that basis, the contention that the remand date must be included while computing the statutory period was held to be untenable.
Conclusion: The remand date is not to be included in computing the period under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the petitioner was not entitled to statutory bail on that ground.