Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was an "industrial company" within the meaning of Section 2(8)(C) Explanation 1 of the Finance Act, 1984 and entitled to tax at the lower rate applicable to such a company.
Analysis: The definition of "industrial company" under the Finance Act, 1984 was held to be pari materia with the corresponding provision in the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1967. The determining factor was whether income attributable to the specified industrial activities formed not less than 51% of the total income. The earlier Delhi High Court decision, which treated income derived through a partnership engaged in manufacturing as satisfying the statutory test, was followed. Since the assessee derived more than 51% of its income from the partnership connected with manufacturing activity, the statutory condition was met.
Conclusion: The assessee was correctly treated as an industrial company and was entitled to the lower rate of tax; the question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.