1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Resolution Professional's Appeals Dismissed; Neutrality Emphasized by SC, Aggrieved Parties Hold Right to Appeal.</h1> The SC determined that the Resolution Professional should have maintained neutrality and not filed appeals. It ruled that the aggrieved parties, such as ... Maintainability of present appeal filed by Resolution Professional - HELD THAT:- The Resolution Professional should not have filed the present appeals. The Resolution Professional should have maintained a neutral stand. It is for the aggrieved parties, including the Committee of Creditors of Regen Powertech Private Limited (RPPL) and Regen Infrastructure and Services Private Limited (RISPL), to take appropriate proceedings or file an appeal before this Court. The present appeals preferred by the Resolution Professional are dismissed as not entertained. Issues involved: The role of Resolution Professional in filing appeals, maintaining neutrality, and the right of aggrieved parties to take appropriate proceedings or file an appeal before the Court.Summary:The Supreme Court, in the present judgment, opined that the Resolution Professional should have maintained a neutral stand and refrained from filing the appeals. The Court emphasized that it is the prerogative of the aggrieved parties, such as the Committee of Creditors of Regen Powertech Private Limited (RPPL) and Regen Infrastructure and Services Private Limited (RISPL), to initiate suitable actions or appeal before the Court. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Resolution Professional were dismissed. The Court also highlighted that if necessary, it can seek assistance and verify the facts from the Resolution Professional in case an appeal is lodged by the Committee of Creditors or any third party. Any pending applications were directed to be disposed of accordingly.