TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Overturns AO's Disallowance, Allows Carry Forward of Business Losses and Unabsorbed Depreciation.</h1> <h3>Burda Druck India Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT Circle-5 (1) New Delhi</h3> Burda Druck India Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT Circle-5 (1) New Delhi - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of carrying forward accumulated business losses of earlier years.2. Disallowance of carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years. Analysis: 1. The appeal was against the CIT(A)'s order regarding the A.Y. 2014-15. The assessee challenged the disallowance of carrying forward accumulated business losses of earlier years. The AO had computed the total income and disallowed the carry forward of losses. The Counsel for the assessee argued that the eligibility of set off brought forward business loss against business income should be considered in the year the set off is claimed. The Tribunal held that the AO's role is to notify the amount of loss, and the decision on carrying forward losses to subsequent years is determined by the AO of those years. Citing the case of CIT Vs. Manmohan Das, the Tribunal emphasized that the AO's decision on not allowing the carry forward of losses is not binding on the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to expunge the remark disallowing the carry forward of losses.2. The second issue was the disallowance of carrying forward unabsorbed depreciation of earlier years. The assessee contended that the AO's observations were unwarranted as no set off of brought forward losses was claimed in the year under consideration. The DR supported the AO's observations. The Tribunal held that the decision on allowing the set off of losses against profits of subsequent years lies with the AO of those years. Relying on legal precedent, the Tribunal emphasized that the AO's conclusion on disallowing the carry forward of losses does not bind the assessee. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to remove the remark disallowing the carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation.In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on both issues, emphasizing that the AO's decision on disallowing the carry forward of losses is not conclusive and does not prevent the assessee from claiming such carry forwards in subsequent years.
TaxTMI 