Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the chartered accountant was guilty of professional misconduct on the allegations relating to audit irregularities and whether the proposed penalty of removal from the register of members was warranted.
Analysis: The reference under Section 21(5) of the Chartered Accountants Act concerned alleged deficiencies in the audit of a closely held company. The materials showed that several of the objections arose from interpretational issues, accounting variables, and omissions that were not shown to be deliberate. The Court held that misconduct requires more than an incorrect professional opinion or an inadvertent lapse; there must be material indicating mala fide intent to mislead or defraud. The explanations offered by the respondent were found acceptable, and the disciplinary record was found to have proceeded mechanically without showing any conscious wrongdoing.
Conclusion: The allegations of misconduct were not established, and the proposed disciplinary action was not justified.
Final Conclusion: The reference failed and the complaint was rejected, with no order of punishment against the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi: A chartered accountant is not guilty of professional misconduct for every erroneous or incomplete audit opinion; misconduct is established only where the lapse is shown to be deliberate or actuated by mala fide intent.