Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a person who was above 16 years of age on the date of offence, but whose case was pending on 1.4.2001, could claim the benefit of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 notwithstanding the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986.
Analysis: The Act of 2000 came into force prospectively from 1.4.2001. The earlier Act of 1986 governed juvenile status by the age of the offender on the date of offence, while the later Act extended juvenile protection up to 18 years and created a limited legal fiction under Section 20 for pending proceedings. That fiction operates only where the accused was below 18 years on the date the 2000 Act commenced. The protection is not retrospective in an absolute sense and does not apply where the accused had already crossed 18 years before 1.4.2001.
Conclusion: The respondent could not claim the benefit of the 2000 Act because he had completed 18 years of age before 1.4.2001; the case had to be dealt with under the law laid down for such pending matters.
Ratio Decidendi: The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 applies to pending cases under the 1986 Act only if the accused had not completed 18 years of age on 1.4.2001.