Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the obligations of the Government of India under the Gleneagles Accord and its membership of the United Nations could be enforced in Indian courts at the instance of citizens or citizens' associations in the absence of legislation implementing those obligations.
Analysis: The constitutional scheme recognises Parliament's power to make laws implementing treaties, while the Directive Principles, including the duty to foster respect for international law and treaty obligations, are expressly non-enforceable by any court. The judgment further notes that, under English law, customary international law may be treated as part of the law of the land, but treaties do not automatically become domestically enforceable without legislative incorporation. Relying on Indian authority, the judgment holds that international covenants or treaty obligations may inspire legislative action, but they do not, by themselves, create enforceable rights in municipal courts unless adopted by appropriate legislation.
Conclusion: The treaty-based obligations were not enforceable by the petitioners in Indian courts, and the challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A treaty or international obligation does not become directly enforceable in Indian municipal law unless and until it is implemented by appropriate legislation.