Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessment could be reopened after the assessee had settled the tax arrears under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and obtained the certificate, and whether the proceedings under section 155 of the Income-tax Act could continue.
Analysis: The Scheme contemplated a considered determination of tax arrears and, upon payment of the amount determined, the statutory immunity became operative. Once the declaration was accepted, the amount was paid, and the certificate was issued, there was no justification to reopen the assessment for the same period except in a case falling within the statutory exception relating to false particulars in the declaration. The order reopening the assessment, therefore, could not stand.
Conclusion: The reopening of the assessment was impermissible and the challenge succeeded in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appellate court set aside the order under challenge and restored finality to the settlement reached under the statutory scheme, granting relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Once tax arrears are settled under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme and the certificate is issued, the assessment for that period cannot be reopened unless the statutory exception for false declaration is attracted.