Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (3) TMI 2013 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Three companies excluded from TP comparable selection due to functional dissimilarity and operational differences ITAT Delhi excluded three companies from TP comparable selection. Accentia Technologies was excluded due to functional dissimilarity as medical ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Three companies excluded from TP comparable selection due to functional dissimilarity and operational differences

                          ITAT Delhi excluded three companies from TP comparable selection. Accentia Technologies was excluded due to functional dissimilarity as medical transcription provider versus routine ITES services, extraordinary asset additions affecting profitability, and unavailable segmental information. TCS Eserve and TCS Eserve International were excluded citing functional dissimilarity, high brand value, fluctuating margins, large operations scale, and significant profitability increases due to acquisitions. For Section 10A deduction, tribunal ruled foreign currency communication charges and database fees must be excluded from total turnover calculation, favoring the assessee against revenue department's position.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Jurisdictional error in the reference made by AO to TPO for computation of arm's length price.
                          2. Determination of arm's length price and transfer pricing adjustments.
                          3. Exclusion of certain expenditures from export turnover for computing deduction under section 10A.
                          4. Validity of initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c).
                          5. Charging and computation of interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Jurisdictional Error in Reference to TPO:
                          The taxpayer argued that the AO did not record any reasons in the assessment order to justify the reference to the TPO for computing the arm's length price under section 92CA(1) of the Act. However, this issue was not specifically adjudicated in the judgment.

                          2. Determination of Arm's Length Price and Transfer Pricing Adjustments:
                          The taxpayer's international transactions were benchmarked using the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM) with Operating Profit/Operating Cost (OP/OC) as the Profit Level Indicator (PLI). The taxpayer selected 7 comparables with an average margin of 13.62%, whereas the TPO rejected 6 out of these 7 comparables and introduced 11 new comparables, resulting in an average margin of 30.12%. The TPO made an adjustment of Rs. 20,288,060/- to the taxpayer's income.

                          The taxpayer contested the inclusion of Accentia Technologies Limited, TCS Eserve Limited, and TCS Eserve International Limited as comparables on the grounds of functional dissimilarity, lack of segmental information, extraordinary events, and brand value impact. The Tribunal agreed with the taxpayer and excluded these companies from the final set of comparables, emphasizing their functional dissimilarity and impact of extraordinary events on profitability.

                          3. Exclusion of Certain Expenditures from Export Turnover for Computing Deduction under Section 10A:
                          The AO excluded communication charges of Rs. 1,84,211/- and database fees of Rs. 19,07,772/- incurred in foreign currency from the export turnover for computing the deduction under section 10A. The Tribunal held that these expenses should also be excluded from the total turnover for the purpose of computing the deduction under section 10A, following the settled legal proposition in various judgments.

                          4. Validity of Initiation of Penalty Proceedings under Section 271(1)(c):
                          The taxpayer argued that the AO/TPO erred in not examining the validity of initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. This issue was not specifically adjudicated in the judgment.

                          5. Charging and Computation of Interest under Sections 234B, 234C, and 234D:
                          The taxpayer contested the AO's computation of interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234D. This issue was not specifically adjudicated in the judgment.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the taxpayer's appeal by excluding the contested comparables (Accentia Technologies Limited, TCS Eserve Limited, and TCS Eserve International Limited) from the final set of comparables and directed the AO to exclude the communication charges and database fees from the total turnover for computing the deduction under section 10A. The appeal was thus partly allowed, providing relief to the taxpayer on significant grounds.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found