Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the penalty set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) required interference; (ii) Whether interest on delayed payment of service tax could be waived.
Issue (i): Whether the penalty set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) required interference.
Analysis: The appellate authority had set aside the penalty relying on prior Tribunal decisions. No reason was found to disturb that conclusion.
Conclusion: The penalty set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals) was not interfered with and the assessee succeeded on this issue.
Issue (ii): Whether interest on delayed payment of service tax could be waived.
Analysis: Section 73(3) of the Finance Act, 1994 was treated as contemplating payment of tax and interest after the lapse is pointed out, and the absence of any provision for waiver of interest led to the conclusion that interest could not be waived for delayed payment.
Conclusion: The respondent was held liable to discharge the interest in accordance with law and the Revenue succeeded on this issue.
Final Conclusion: The order was sustained insofar as penalty was concerned, but the assessee was directed to pay interest on the delayed service tax payment.