Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of appellants on erroneous refund issue under Notification No. 56/2002</h1> <h3>M/s Ravi Crop Science Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu & Kashmir And Shri Dinesh Garg, Partner M/s Ravi Crop Science Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu & Kashmir</h3> M/s Ravi Crop Science Versus The Commissioner of Central Excise, Jammu & Kashmir And Shri Dinesh Garg, Partner M/s Ravi Crop Science Versus The ... Issues Involved:1. Applicability of Section 11A for recovery of 'erroneous refund'.2. Validity of the refund sanctioned under Notification No. 56/2002.3. Allegations of fraud, collusion, or willful misstatement by the appellants.4. Imposition of penalty on the company and Shri Dinesh Garg.Summary of Judgment:1. Applicability of Section 11A for Recovery of 'Erroneous Refund':The appellants argued that Section 11A, which deals with the recovery of duty 'erroneously refunded,' is not applicable to refunds under Notification No. 56/2002. They cited a Board Circular dated 19.12.2002, which clarified that the refunds under this notification are not due to excess payment of excise duty but are a mechanism to operationalize the exemption. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11A concerning 'erroneous refund' do not apply.2. Validity of the Refund Sanctioned under Notification No. 56/2002:The refund was duly sanctioned by the Departmental officers in terms of Notification No. 56/2002, and such orders are appealable under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellants contended that the refund orders had been accepted by the Department after due application of mind and thus could not be termed 'erroneous.' They relied on various case laws, including Krishi Rasayan Exports Pvt. Ltd. and others, to support their argument.3. Allegations of Fraud, Collusion, or Willful Misstatement:The Tribunal found no material evidence to suggest that the appellants had suppressed any material facts or made any willful misstatement to evade payment of duty. The High Court of J&K in Krishi Rasayan Exports Pvt. Ltd. had previously ruled that the extended period of limitation under Section 11A could not be invoked in the absence of fraud, collusion, or willful misstatement. The Tribunal concurred with this view, noting that the refunds were sanctioned after a transparent process and periodic audits.4. Imposition of Penalty on the Company and Shri Dinesh Garg:Since the impugned order was found to be legally unsustainable on merits, the question of imposing penalties on the company or Shri Dinesh Garg did not arise. The Tribunal set aside the penalties.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was not legally sustainable and set it aside. Both appeals were allowed, and the penalties were dismissed. The judgment was pronounced on 11/10/2023.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found