1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Case Remanded for Merits Decision as Appellant Complies with 10% Deposit Requirement Under Appeal Process</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a decision on the merits. This decision was based on the ... Maintainability of appeal - appeal rejected for non-deposit of 7.5% of the confirmed demand - Section 35F of the Central Excise Act - HELD THAT:- The appellant has now deposited 10% of demand at the time of filing of appeal before Tribunal. As such, the impugned order set aside and the matter remanded to Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits. Appeal allowed by way of remand. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for decision on merits as the appellant had deposited 10% of the demand at the time of filing the appeal before the Tribunal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
