1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rectifies errors in service tax liability order, grants applications for corrections</h1> The Tribunal allowed the applications for rectification of mistakes in the final order regarding service tax liability for multiple appeals. Corrections ... Rectification of mistake - error apparent on the face of record or not - in para 8 of the impugned order, in place if ''three'' appeals,''two'' appeals are only mentioned - HELD THAT:- Necessary changes have been carried out. The applications are accordingly allowed and the final order is corrected. Issues involved: Rectification of mistakes in the final order regarding service tax liability for multiple appeals.In this case, three applications were filed for rectification of mistakes in the final order dated 28/07/2016, which disposed of three appeals by the appellant/assessee and one appeal by the Revenue. The main issue was the service tax liability, which the Tribunal had decided in a common order for all three appeals. The correction sought was to rectify an error in para 8 of the order where only 'two' appeals were mentioned instead of 'three.' The period covered in the proceedings was also incorrectly stated. After hearing both sides, the Tribunal made specific corrections to the final order. The word 'two' in para 8 was substituted with 'three,' and the correct period was inserted. Additionally, the time frame mentioned in line 12 of page 8 was amended to accurately reflect the periods involved. A new para 9 was substituted to provide clarity on the disposition of appeals and tax liability based on the findings. The applications for rectification were allowed, and the final order was corrected accordingly.