Common object and private defence evidence were decisive in restoring convictions for murder and rioting.

Reliable ocular testimony, supported by spot and medical evidence, can sustain convictions where the surrounding circumstances corroborate the prosecution version. Here, the scene materials, injuries and conduct of the parties supported the claim that the accused were encroaching on land and had provoked the confrontation, while the injuries on the accused were explained as arising from defensive use of lathis. The High Court was found to have discarded trustworthy evidence on speculative grounds and to have accepted private defence without adequate basis. The acquittal was therefore set aside and guilt was affirmed for murder with common object, along with rioting armed with deadly weapons and unlawful assembly.

---

---

Issues: Whether the High Court was justified in acquitting the respondents on the plea of private defence and in discarding the prosecution evidence, and whether the evidence established the offences under Sections 302/149, 148 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code.

Analysis: The prosecution version was supported by the ocular evidence of the principal witnesses and by the spot and medical evidence. The circumstances found at the scene, including the newly constructed mend, rope, spades, blood-stained earth and cartridge material, corroborated the case that the accused were encroaching on the widows' land and had provoked the confrontation there. The injuries on the accused were explained by the evidence that the deceased and others had used lathis in self-defence. The High Court had rejected reliable testimony on speculative grounds and had wrongly accepted the plea of private defence without adequate basis. The evidence established that the accused acted with a common object and used deadly weapons, causing the deaths of four persons and injuries to P.W. 2.

Conclusion: The acquittal was set aside. The respondents were held guilty under Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and appropriate convictions under Sections 148 and 147 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 were also recorded.

---