Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the order granting bail to the accused, who was facing trial for murder and Arms Act offences, was liable to be set aside in exercise of the power to cancel bail.
Analysis: Cancellation of bail is not to be ordered mechanically, and ordinarily requires cogent material showing misuse of liberty or other supervening circumstances. At the same time, while considering whether bail ought to have been granted in the first place, the court must examine the nature of the accusation, the severity of punishment, the supporting material, and whether the order granting bail reflects a proper application of mind. On the facts, the accused was alleged to have participated in a murder, the material indicated his presence at the scene, and the grant of bail was found to be unsustainable in view of the serious nature of the offence and the prima facie material against him.
Conclusion: The bail order was set aside and the accused was directed to surrender.
Final Conclusion: The petitions succeeded, and the accused's release on bail was withdrawn on the basis of the prima facie material and the seriousness of the charges.
Ratio Decidendi: In a serious offence case, bail can be cancelled where the order granting bail is found to be mechanical or unsupported by a proper consideration of the prima facie material and gravity of the .