TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an objection under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure was maintainable against execution of an arbitral award when the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a specific remedy under Section 34 for challenging the award.
Analysis: Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides a specific statutory procedure for setting aside an arbitral award. The Act is a special enactment governing challenge to awards, and objections falling within the scope of that remedy cannot be pursued by resorting to Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure in execution proceedings.
Conclusion: The objection under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure was not maintainable.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
