Tribunal upholds Resolution Plan despite challenge on GST dues provision

The Tribunal upheld the approval of the Resolution Plan in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process despite a creditor's challenge regarding insufficient provision for outstanding GST dues recoverable from the Corporate Debtor. Citing a Supreme Court judgment, the Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of approved Resolution Plans on stakeholders, including creditors. It concluded that the Resolution Plan's adequacy is a commercial decision of the Committee of Creditors, and absent valid grounds, the Tribunal cannot interfere. The appeal was not admitted, and no costs were imposed on either party.

---

---

Issues:
Challenge to Resolution Plan Approval based on insufficient provision for outstanding GST dues recoverable from Corporate Debtor.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against an order approving a Resolution Plan by the Adjudicating Authority in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Appellant, a creditor for CGST, claimed outstanding GST dues from the Corporate Debtor. The claim was partially admitted but the Resolution Plan provided only a minimal amount for settlement, which the Appellant argued was insufficient given the outstanding claim amount. The Appellant contended that the approved Resolution Plan needed interference due to the inadequate provision for their dues.

The Tribunal considered the arguments presented and referred to a judgment by the Supreme Court in a similar context. The Supreme Court's judgment stated that once a Resolution Plan is approved, the claims provided in the plan are binding and any claims not included in the plan stand extinguished. The Tribunal emphasized that the Resolution Plan, once approved, is binding on various stakeholders, including the Central Government and other creditors. The Tribunal highlighted that the sufficiency or insufficiency of the amount provided in the Resolution Plan is a commercial decision of the Committee of Creditors, and it is not within their purview to interfere unless there are valid grounds.

Based on the Supreme Court's judgment and the principles outlined, the Tribunal concluded that the approved Resolution Plan was binding on the stakeholders, and the Tribunal did not find grounds to admit the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal declined to admit the appeal and disposed of it as not admitted, without imposing any costs on either party.

---