Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, a non-resident of India and resident of China, was entitled to exemption under Article 15(1) of the India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement in respect of salary and bonus received for services rendered in China, and whether the bonus component could be taxed in India.
Analysis: The assessee claimed that the remuneration related to services rendered outside India and therefore fell within Article 15(1) of the treaty. The Revenue relied on the view that the bonus formed part of the employment compensation and was attributable to the original employer, and that Article 23 of the treaty granted relief only to a resident of India in the relevant context. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision on the same treaty provisions and held that, on the facts of a non-resident employee resident of China, the assessee was not entitled to the claimed treaty exemption under Article 15(1).
Conclusion: The claim for exemption under Article 15(1) was rejected and the addition of the bonus amount in India was sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the assessment was upheld insofar as it denied treaty exemption on the disputed remuneration.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the India-China treaty, a non-resident assessee who is resident in China was not entitled to the claimed exemption under Article 15(1) on the facts found by the Tribunal, and the corresponding remuneration could be brought to tax in India.