1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Consolidation of Petitions for Directions, Stay on Coercive Steps</h1> The Bombay High Court ordered the consolidation of multiple petitions for consideration, including the current petition and related ones, under the ... Seeking stay on demand - HELD THAT:- Considering the fact that the other Petitions are pending on the same issue between the same parties, it is appropriate that they be heard together. List this Petition along with the other Petitions bearing WP Nos. 1608/22 and 3480/22, WP (St.) Nos. 26233/22, 26235/22, 26236/22 and 26237/22 on 27 February 2023 under the caption “For Directions” so that a suitable date can be fixed. Issues: Consolidation of multiple petitions for considerationAnalysis:The judgment by the Bombay High Court involved the consolidation of multiple petitions for consideration. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner highlighted the existence of another Writ Petition where notice was issued and the demand stayed subject to the Petitioner depositing 20% of the local body tax. The Counsel requested that this Petition, along with several other related Writ Petitions, be taken up for consideration. On the other hand, the Counsel for the Respondents opposed this consolidation, arguing that the Petitioners in other cases had filed appeals and should be directed to do the same. However, the Court, considering the fact that the other Petitions were pending on the same issue between the same parties, deemed it appropriate for all the petitions to be heard together.Orders:The Court ordered the consolidation of the current Petition with the other related Petitions bearing various numbers under the caption 'For Directions' on 27 February 2023. This consolidation aimed to facilitate a comprehensive consideration of all the connected matters. Additionally, the Court directed that in the interim period, no coercive steps should be taken against the Petitioner as per the impugned order. This decision ensured that the Petitioner would not face any immediate adverse actions while the consolidation and subsequent proceedings took place.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
